|
Judge Roy Moore
|
|
|
|
Standing in the gap for God and the American Way
|
|
His Ruling on Child Custody by Homosexuals Reveals The Perversion of their Lifestyle
A report compiled and prepared by
Michael L. Ford, Th.D.
Index
Introduction 1 How Judge Roy Moore is the focus of the ire of those who hate God and America
The Event 2-4 How the routine event of writing the opinion on an unanimous Supreme Court case once again made Judge Moore the focus of evil doers ire.
The Folly of the Religious Left 5-6 How the liberal apostates attack on Judge Moore operates to demonstrate their folly to the world and embarrass believers who make the mistake of continuing to support them.
The Rally 7-9 How a preplanned rally altered into a gathering to attack Judge Roy Moore still could only turn up about a hundred demonstrators including officials and reporters. The Aftermath 10-11How saner voices speak to condemn those who spoke in haste against Judge Moore.
Who Is Chief Justice Roy Moore 12-13 The official biography of Roy Moore taken from the Alabama Supreme Court internet site.
Introduction
The perverts of the nation cannot stand it that there is someone who is willing to stand, even stand alone, against them. They hate it that there is a man in a place of responsibility who is not only doing the right thing but is succeeding in continuing to do it over and over again. The liberal and depraved judges who have slipped into office during those days of folly when liberal presidents are in office cannot stand it that there is a man of principle that also occupies the judicial bench who will not be intimidated by them. These libertines have generally got into the positions they occupy because elected liberal presidents used their appointments to placate their depraved constituency.[1] Many are so evil and consumed in their hatred for God and American principles that they refuse to render rulings in accordance with established law, and they hate Judge Moore for doing so. Today the voices that are heard and quoted without criticism in religious circles are those who are attacking some tenet of the faith they claim to hold. Through his stand for the truth's of the Bible and the fact the Word of God is the backbone of American law, Judge Roy Moore has frequently rubbed these infidels and heretics noses in the vomit of their own corruption. In short his stand has stood as an indictment of these charlatans of the faith. Honesty on the part of someone in the public eye is refreshing, morality is astounding, ethics are unusual, consistency is surprising, and genuineness is unheard of. But this is the man and kind of judge Roy Moore seems to be. This is a report of one episode in the life of this hero of the faith.
The Event
On February the fifteenth, the Alabama State Supreme Court made a ruling related to the case of a lesbian mother who was seeking to win custody of her three teenage children from their father. As is common in divorce custody cases these days the lesbian mother charged her former husband with being physically and verbally abusive.[2] The Supreme Court in a 9-0 verdict found that that this was not the case. The media, and in particular the more liberal parts of it grossly mislead their reading public in their presentation of the facts of this case.[3] For instance they reported that a state appellate court had agreed with the mother's complaint. What they did not say was that the original trial court, which is correctly vested with being the authority most capable of making such findings had ruled to the contrary. The court in its finding indicated that the appellate court had acted wrongly saying: The appellate court must not substitute its judgment or "reweigh the evidence," but will reverse only if the trial court has abused its discretion or if that court's determination so lacks factual support as to be plainly and palpably wrong…The trial court is in the best position to hear the evidence, to observe the witnesses, and, therefore, to sit in judgment of disputed evidence presented ore tenus … An appellate court oversteps its bounds when it presumes itself the superior arbiter of testimony previously viewed, heard, and judged -- in living color -- by a trial judge elected to do precisely that. Though the Supreme Court made its ruling unanimously, the perverts and hedonists chose to turn their ire, vent their spleens, in the direction of Judge Roy Moore who wrote the detailed opinion that can now be read on the internet. One of the reasons for their outrage, besides the fact they need someone to hate, is that they know that this opinion should be a factor that is weighed in subsequent court decisions for many years to come. The opinion of Judge Moore was unfairly characterized by the liberal wordsmiths as an unleashed torrent of abhorrent rhetoric, and with other such expressions.[4] Actually his opinion was an even handed presentation of the history of related law, the facts of the case, and the truths of the reality of homosexual behavior as has been codified in Alabama law. He did point out that the mother's lifestyle was detrimental to the children and in fact illegal in that State. Some of the statements contained in his finding helps to clarify what we are speaking of here: Referring to another case symbolized by the initials J.M.F, Judge Moore observed there; the mother and her lesbian partner had "established a two-parent home environment where their homosexual relationship [was] openly practiced and presented to the child as the social and moral equivalent of a heterosexual marriage." In doing so, this Court said that the mother had "chosen to expose the child continuously to a lifestyle that is 'neither legal in this state, nor moral in the eyes of most of its citizens.'" Going to a case preceding that the Judge said; Only months before its decision in J.M.F., this Court, in awarding a mother only restricted visitation rights held that "the trial court did not abuse its discretion in considering the effects on the children of their mother's ongoing lesbian relationship." …This Court held that the restriction of visitation was a "common tool{} used to shield a child from the harmful effects of a parent's illicit sexual relationships -- heterosexual or homosexual." …Moreover, this Court noted that because "conduct inherent in lesbianism is illegal in Alabama," the mother was "continually engaging in conduct that violates the criminal law of this state." Coming to the case at hand and with an established basis in law the judge proclaimed: Exposing her children to such a lifestyle, one that is illegal under the laws of this state and immoral in the eyes of most of its citizens, could greatly traumatize them. Given both the demonstrable harm to these children that has already occurred and the potential for harm through continued exposure to their mother's lifestyle, we cannot hold that the trial court abused its discretion in imposing these limitations on [the mother's] visitation. Judge Moore in making his finding was not only on solid Biblical, ethical, and moral ground, but was also firmly ensconced on solid legal ground. But the people who write the news, the activist groups, and the liberal religious leaders would have you to believe this is not so. 4. The Folly of the Religious Left
Weighing in on the side of perversion, as is normal for the religious left, they once again took this opportunity to parade their ignorance. For instance the Rev. Timothy Holder, rector of Grace Episcopal Church in Birmingham,[5] characterized Judge Moore's opinion as "unnecessary." He is apparently unaware that such concurring opinions are written all the time as are dissenting opinions and both are important to the future of case law. It is actually preferential to consider him as merely ignorant and not part of that group of people who believe the only ones who have a right to speak are those who agree with them.[6] It was this same Timothy Holder, who read a statement on behalf of Bishop Henry N. Parsley Jr. of the Episcopal Diocese of Alabama that succeeded in scandalizing and embarrassing members of the conservative element of that church. Many members of the Episcopal church have become so alienated by the heretical ideas of many who live of their tithe that they have abandoned the denomination altogether. Among other things Bishop Parsley was quoted as saying, " it is dangerous to label any group of human beings inherently evil. "Such statements ... can lead to fear, prejudice and violence that tear at the fabric of our life together," In this statement he either displayed ignorance or was guilty of mischaracterizing what the Judge had said.[7] The Right Reverend Mark Andrus joined with Bishop Parsley in the statement that declares; ." We recognize that the subject of homosexuality is and has been a complex and controversial one in society and in the history of the Christian Church." The truth is that the subject of homosexuality is not complex, but rather simple. The issue is a gross and reprehensible sin that some people in church hierarchies want to see condoned and tolerated for one reason or another. In recent times the pedophilia and other sexual excesses that have existed for centuries in some groups have come to the fore and become part of the common knowledge. A great many people are tolerant of certain sins because of the gross activities they are involved in; others are tolerant because of the liberal theology and unbiblical practices they have chosen to believe; still others endorse these activities because of financial reward or fear of losing their retirements.[8] Not everyone who spoke out from religious circles was on the side of the leftist preachers who got so much of the attention. Dean Young, executive director of the Gadsden-based Christian Family Association, weighed in on the side of Judge Moore in response to these so-called preachers. He said the criticism of Moore came from "a fringe group" that he called "a gnat on the rear end of an elephant." "What we've seen here really is an embarrassment to the people, especially the people that go to these churches," said Young. He went on to say, "It is an absolute shame to have people that are calling themselves men of God to stand up here and condone the homosexual lifestyle." He called homosexuality "a deviant, destructive lifestyle" and said pastors who condone it need to "need to get another job."[9] To this we say. Amen. But men who speak the truth do not get the coverage of a Bishop John Shelby Spong who has proven himself the darling of the pornographers and others who practice evil on the internet since his retirement. His recent work, Homosexuality and the Bible, once again served to display his total lack of Biblical doctrine as well as a perverse view of history. Many have openly wondered how much longer God will allow this man to continue displaying his heresies before He acts. This writer is convinced that the reason that God has not acted is because the church neglected its Scriptural mandate to discipline him. The Rally
A rally had been scheduled for the Tuesday night following Judge Moore's opinion. It was planned to take place on the steps of the Alabama state capitol in Montgomery to mark the three-year anniversary of the death of Billy Jack Gaither. The homosexual leadership used the fact they already had people lined up to come to help them stage a demonstration against Roy Moore that evening.
|
|
|
|
|
