Some Questions and Answers
About the Roman Catholic Church
Compiled, Edited and Arranged by
Dr. Michael L. Ford
With the death of Pope John Paul II, some people have started giving thought to what the Roman Catholic Church is
beyond all the hype, which some have correctly referred to as “smoke and mirrors,” a reference to how magicians
mediums have often sought to fool the public. It is a proper term to use
in relation to
learn the truth about the Roman Catholic Church. That is a learning process I hope to begin in you with this booklet.
The cover picture was taken off the official website of Pope John Paul II. Since it is an official picture they can
hardly object if I use the picture as representative of them and their institution: There are two things I would
like you to notice right away. The first is the keys in the upper right hand portion of the picture. They remind
of the claim that the Roman Church and its leader claim direct authority from Peter, who they say was the first
Pope and has the keys to heaven and hell. They claim this in spite of the fact that:
1. Peter was the Apostle to the Jews; not Gentiles;
is no evidence he was ever in
claim Peter holds the keys is based on Scripture twisting, a talent
The second thing is that the staff held by the dead Pope is no shepherd’s staff, but it does have
upon it the figure of Christ hanging on the cross. The religion of
sacrifice in spite of the fact Scripture teaches the Lord Jesus Christ sacrificed but once. Both of these
claims are not about their concern for the salvation of men, but about having power over men.
The information presented in this booklet is both gleaned from others and some portion is written
directly by myself. I have not tried to separate what portion is what in the booklet because even that which
comes from others is heavily edited and because there is limited space on these pages to record information.
I considered it more important to make the information available to you quickly than prepare tedious footnotes.
I have tried to take the utmost care to be completely accurate in all that is within these covers. My only
purpose is to bring people to the truth.
The Importance of Pope John Paul II
Dr Joseph Chambers addressed the importance of this last Pope, perhaps more concisely than
other single person who understands the evils of
of ways in which this Pope has played a role in setting things up for End Time events, calling him
“The Most Prophetic Pope of Catholic History.” Below is the list of the late Pope’s accomplishments.
* Opened the door for Muslims to be called a “religion of faith and peace.”
* Clearly embraced all pagan religions of the world and made them acceptable to Western mindset.
* Elevated the religious world, “when united” to be seen as the only instrument of peace. This pope has
made “world peace” the gospel of the twenty-first century.
* He has succeeded in preparing almost every political entity on the planet to pay homage to him.
seven years of hell on earth.
* The mainline churches have totally succumbed to the Roman system of religion.
* The Evangelicals are on the verge of complete collapse into the arms of the Catholic embrace of death.
Charismatics have long ago become a tool of
of truth and error.
* Pope John Paul II has made Mary worship acceptable within the whole church except Bible believing
* Images, statues, icons, liturgical fanfare in worship, and other Catholic designs were only acceptable in extremely
liberal churches before this pope. Today Roman styles and designs have flooded the church world.
* The Catholic Church has from her beginning embraced other religious doctrines and ideals, and
them as a means to reach into the world cultures. Bible believers have always rejected such compromise
until the last two or three decades.
* Finally this pope has deceived the church world to go back to the Bible of Catholic design. The Alexandrian
texts and manuscripts were Catholic from the beginning and have now become the text of choice in almost
every Christian college and university on the face of the earth. This is the final accomplishment in making this
“Harlot” the “Mother of Harlots.”
Joseph Chambers has addressed, to substantiate, each of these claims at length. This was published in
“The End Times and Victorious Living” If you want to get the specifics of each of these, and we recommend
that those who are serious students do, you can contact Paw Creek Ministries, 5110 Tuckaseegee Road,
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28208, or phone U.S.A. 704-391-0588. Their e-mail address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
Ask for a copy of the March-April 2005 publication.
The claims of Dr. Chambers are substantially accurate. We say “substantially” because many of the
things he credits to the late pope were already a work in progress when he ascended to the throne of the Popes,
and because we actually consider that this list should be considered a short list, not an exhaustive one. The Roman
Church is working on a long term “game plan” to recover and extend its world domination. We agree with Dr. Chambers
that this last pope has a been a central figure in bringing the world closer to the One World Religion the Antichrist will
need to work his evil. The talents of Pope John Paul II were key to where the world stands in relation to the coming
Great Tribulation today.3.
Question: Catholics teach Mary was eternally a virgin. Didn’t Jesus have brothers and sisters (siblings)?"
Luke 8:19, and Mark 3:31 say that Jesus’ mother and brothers came to see Him. Jesus had four brothers: James, Joseph,
Simon, and Judas (Matthew ). Jesus also had sisters but they are not named or numbered (Matthew -56).
In John 7:1-10, His brothers go on to the festival. In Acts , His brothers and mother prayed to Him. Later in Galatians
1:19, it mentions that James was Jesus’ brother. The most natural conclusion of these passages is to interpret that Jesus had
actual blood siblings. There is no Biblical reason to believe that these siblings are not the actual children of Mary and Joseph.
They were obviously born after Jesus, because Jesus was born of a virgin (Isaiah 7:14; Luke 1:26-38).
Question: Who wrote the New Testament? Why not accept the Apocrypha, Gnostic Gospels, or the Gospel
included apocryphal books as well as other spurious books of antiquity.
The Gospel writers Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were previously mentioned as credible sources, two
of them having been Jesus’ closest followers. The other New Testament authors were considered
trustworthy as well: James and Jude (half-brothers of Jesus, who by the way did not initially believe
in Him), Peter (one of the 12 apostles), and Saul of Tarsus (whom Jesus made an apostle after His death and resurrection).
The church knew about these men and their relationship to Jesus. Moreover, what they wrote was
consistent with what people had heard and seen themselves regarding Jesus, and had passed on to their
children. When other books were written and appeared hundreds of years later (e.g., the Gospel of Peter,
though Peter had long since died), it wasn't difficult for the church to spot them as phonies, as forgeries.
Another example is the Gospel of Thomas (which
Mohammed references in the Koran). The Gospel of Thomas was written around 140 A.D., long after Thomas
had died. Though it bore some similarities to the New Testament's authentic Gospel of Matthew, it also contained
wildly different messages. The descriptions of Jesus did not fit anything the early church knew to be true of Him.
Our examples, which show the contrast between the New Testament Gospels and the Gospel of Thomas, follow:
Throughout New Testament Gospels, Jesus treats women with dignity atypical to Middle Eastern culture. Jesus
taught women as well as men, spoke against unfair divorce laws, was kind toward women of even questionable
character, and appeared first to women after his resurrection, entrusting them with the message that he was alive.
Jesus’ respect toward women cut against cultural norms, and was an issue that angered the religious leaders.
Yet the Gospel of Thomas contains a completely contradictory statement attributed to Jesus: "Let Mary go
away from us, because women are not worthy of life." And: "For every woman who makes herself male will
enter into the kingdom of heaven." Books like the Gospel of Thomas were written and circulated among the
early church, it was not difficult for people to discern the forgeries. Texts, like these and the gnostic gospels,
attacked well known teachings of Jesus as well as the Old Testament, often containing numerous historical and
An official list of New Testament books became necessary for the following reasons:
(1) As Christians were being martyred books were being destroyed so there was a need to determine which ones to protect;
(2) In translating the books into Syriac and Old Latin, a listing of authoritative books was important;
(3) False books and false teachings were always challenging the church and leadership needed to be clear.
In A.D. 367, Athanasius formally listed the 27 New Testament books (the same list that we have today). Soon after,
Jerome and Augustine circulated this same list.
Roman Catholicism adds apocrypha to their bible to promote false teachings beneficial to them as a religious
power. These were not accepted by the faithful church they persecuted.
Question: Catholicism teaches praying to Mary and Saints. Does the Bible say about doing this?
(2) There is only the repeated example of two things in Scripture:
(a) Prayer is made to the Lord alone (by righteous people) (Romans 10:1; Romans ; Acts 12:5; Acts 10:2;
Acts ; Acts ; Zechariah -22; Jonah 2:7; 4:2)
(b) Requests for prayer are made only to the living (1Thessalonians ; 2Thessalonians 3:1; Hebrews ).
(3) We are never told to communicate with the dead (even with prayer requests). When Saul tried to communicate with
Samuel, it was deemed an evil thing, not a good thing (those who support praying to the saints may say it was only deemed
evil because of the manner in which he sought to do it...through witchcraft). It is interesting to note that Samuel told Saul
that if God wasn't listening to him, there was nothing that he could do then either
(1 Samuel 28:16).
(4) We are never told to pray to angels. When people had occasion to talk with any angel besides the Angel of the
Lord and tried to worship them, they were told to stop and worship God alone (Revelation ; 22:9; Colossians ).
(5) We are never told that the dead know what is going on the earth (some think it is possible based on one interpretation
of Hebrews 12:1).
(6) God alone is omniscient and omnipresent. He alone can hear a multitude of prayers simultaneously. He is the one who
commands angels and sends them to do His bidding (Dan. -23).
(7) Angels (Daniel
-23) and the spirits of the
dead remain finite (Luke 16:19f.), limited to one location at a time.
(8) The Catholic’s statement that they go to angels, saints, and Mary to ask for prayer is not consistent with the normal
practice of asking for prayer. For example, in the saying of the Rosary the large majority of the time is spent in devotion to
Mary and then they ask her to pray for them now and at the hour of their death (they pray this same prayer 50 times).
Whereas, when I ask someone to pray for me, I don't ask them over and over and over again minute after minute. Rather,
I ask them to pray and then should be spending my time on my knees before the Lord not before them.
(9) God promised to hear us when we ask anything according to His will (1John -15; 1 Peter ). He entreats us to
come boldly unto the throne of grace (His throne) that we may find grace and help in time of need (Hebrews ).
(10) God promised us that the Holy Spirit makes intercession for us according to the will of the Lord with groaning that
cannot be uttered (Romans 8:26). Considering such truths, why do we need to go through a saint, angel or Mary, especially
considering the fact that neither the example of doing so, nor the command of doing it is ever given in Scripture? The Catholic
Church cites the example of the wedding feast (John 2) as an example of Mary getting Jesus to do something for others and
uses that as a proof text for prayer to her. It is ridiculous to use this example to support such a doctrine when it flies in the
face of the many other admonitions and examples of praying to God alone.
Therefore, not only is it contrary to Scriptural admonitions to pray to God and Scriptural example to pray to Mary,
but it is illogical to substitute praying to an all-loving, omniscient, and omnipotent Father who invites us to come before
His throne because He is completely acquainted with all of our doings (Psalm 139) to pray to some saint who can
only listen to one conversation at a time (all the time not ever being sure if the saints in heaven know what is taking
place in our lives here on earth).
His Word says that there is one Almighty and one Mediator between Him and man, the Lord Jesus Christ (Messiah)
(1Timothy 2:5). Let us then come to
the Father through His work on the cross of
but also for our needs as well (Hebrews ).
Question: What is the Immaculate Conception, which Roman Catholicism teaches?
conception was most assuredly immaculate, but the Roman Catholic concept does not refer to Jesus at all. The Immaculate
Conception is a doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church in regards to Mary, the Man Jesus’ mother. An official statement
of the doctrine reads, “…the blessed Virgin Mary to have been, from the first instant of her conception, by a singular grace
and privilege of Almighty God, in view of the merits of Adonai Yeshua the Savior of Mankind, preserved free from all stain of
Essentially the Immaculate Conception is the belief that Mary was protected from original sin, that Mary did not
have a sin nature. Some go so far as to teach that Mary was, in fact, sinless.
The problem with the doctrine of Immaculate Conception is that it is not taught in the Bible. The Bible nowhere
describes Mary as anything but an ordinary human female whom God chose to be the mother of the Lord Jesus.
Mary was undoubtedly a godly woman (Luke ). Mary was surely a wonderful wife and mother. Jesus definitely
loved and cherished His mother (John ). But the Bible gives us no reason to believe Mary was sinless.
In fact, the Bible gives us every reason to believe that Jesus is the only Person who never committed a sin (Ecclesiastes
; Romans 3:23; 2 Corinthians 5:21; 1 Peter 2:22; 1 John 3:5).
The doctrine of the Immaculate Conception originated out of confusion over how Jesus could be born sinless if He
was conceived inside of a sinful human female. The thought is Jesus would have inherited a sin nature from Mary
had she been a sinner. In contrast to Immaculate Conception, the Biblical solution to this problem is understanding
the sin nature is inherited from the father, for in Adam all are sinners. Therefore, Mary being sinless is neither
necessary nor Biblical.
So, the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception is neither Biblical nor necessary. Jesus was miraculously conceived
inside Mary, who was a virgin at the time. That is the Biblical concept of the virgin birth. The Bible does not even
hint that there was
anything significant about Mary’s conception. If we examine this concept logically, Mary’s mother would have to be
immaculately conceived as well. Which is what the Roman Catholic Church sometimes teaches. How could Mary
be conceived without sin if her mother was sinful? But wouldn’t the same have to be said of Mary’s grandmother,
great-grandmother, and so on. You see how this error like any lie snowballs? So, in conclusion, the Immaculate
Conception is not a Biblical teaching. The Bible teaches the preplanned, prophesied miraculous virginal conception
of Jesus, not the Immaculate Conception of Mary.
Question: In a Bible study with some friends they were quoting from books I had never heard of.
They couldn’t tell me why these books were in their American Bible but not in my King James.
One of the books was called First Maccabee. Do you know about this book?
meaning hidden, spurious.
In modern times, some have deceptively referred to these books as "the Lost Books of the Bible."
(They have also added other ancient manuscripts to the list.) But in actuality these books had not
been lost. Christians and Jews have always known about them. The name Apocrypha was given to
certain ancient books, which found a place in the LXX. and Latin Vulgate versions of the Old Testament
used by Catholics today. They are not accepted as Scripture by most Protestants or Jews, and certainly
not by faithful Baptists. They were appended to all the great Bible translations made from documents
in the sixteenth century. However, they should not be regarded in any sense as parts of the inspired Word.
The King James translators certainly did not for they refused to apply the same translation standard to
them as they did to the true books of the Bible.
Why are they not accepted? For one reason they are not once quoted by the New Testament writers,
who frequently quote from the LXX. Jesus and his disciples confirmed by their authority the canon, which
was the same as we have today. These books
were written not in Hebrew but in Greek, and during the "period of silence," from the time of Malachi, after which
direct revelations from God ceased till the Christian era. The contents of the books themselves show that they are
not part of
the Books of Esdras, the Book of Wisdom, the Book of Baruch, the Book of Esther, Ecclesiasticus, Tobit, Judith, etc.
Others include: Bel and the Dragon (addition to Daniel), Daniel and Susanna (addition to Daniel), Additions to Esther,
Letter of Jeremiah, Prayer of Azariah (addition to Daniel), The Prayer of Manasseh, Psalm 151, Sirach, Tobit, and The
Wisdom of Solomon. Ancient Jewish writers and rabbis did not accept them as Scripture and neither should we.
There were over 300 books for the early church fathers to pick from when they were canonizing the bible
we have today. Many of those books are not in this list and might be read with interest, but not taken as
Question: I heard a preacher say that the Great Whore in Revelation 17 was the Roman Catholic Church.
I asked friends about
this and they said that this was known because the place called
is the city set on seven hills. Is this true, and if so how do we know that it is?
Answer: There has never been any difficulty on the part of enlightened believers in identifying the woman sitting upon
the scarlet colored beast with the Romish religion, anymore than there is difficulty in identifying the city spoken of as
that has wisdom, which explains why this simple truth is hidden from many.
Concerning the location of the woman, the matter is made plain for there has never been any city more famous
of the ancient city as their own. Pagan poets and orators, who had no thought of supporting Biblical prophecy have alike
become the most beautiful (city) in the world, and alone has surrounded for herself seven heights with a wall.” Propertius
B.C.) wrote a description supporting
the apocalyptic picture when he remarked that
world. Roman citizens habitually used reference to the “seven-hilled city” as a descriptive substitute for the proper name.
The philosopher/poet Horace (65-8 B.C.) said, “The gods…(demonic beings worshipped by pagans) have set their affections
on the seven hills.” You will note that these preceded the time of Christ and that they affirmed the interpretation that the
Revelation 17 is to
and though some have tried to cloud the matter, the identification continues to this day.
It is also easy to show that the Church, which has its headquarters
in that place might also easily be called
as well. Alexander
Hislop remarked “it is the chief seat of idolatry under the New Testament,
as the ancient
chief seat of idolatry under the Old.” Modern commentators have made much of the fact that first century Christians were in the
habit of referring to Rome as Babylon, but we are not knowledgeable with any certainty how well they understood, apart from
the teaching of the Holy Spirit, how well the paganism of ancient Babylon was to be transposed into the religion whose seat
was in Rome.
Popery has been called baptized paganism, but from the very infancy of modern archaeology it began to be abundantly
clear, especially with
This is perhaps why there have been so many occasions when the region has been closed to the explorer into antiquities.
Satan himself may have fought to see that not too much was revealed. But the language and symbols of the Book of Revelation
should have prepared us to not be amazed at the goodly amount we have been able to learn.
I am not the first to observe that the name being written on her forehead might indicate God intended for the matter
to be plain before judgment would overtake her. How much more plain that might be is yet to be seen.
Question: I have heard it said that the Roman Catholic Church was anti-Semitic, yet there has been a lot of
reaching out to the
anti-Semitic, and if so, what is going on?
Answer: The Roman Church has been anti-Semitic since even before it became married to the world in the fourth century.
The expression “Christ killers” has been one they have trumpeted many times over the centuries. No group suffered any
greater persecution during the terrible years of the Inquisition than the Jewish people. The reason there has been a reaching
out to the Jewish State
is because the popes down through history have longed to possess
are getting ready for the last great attempt to do so.
are some beliefs that are held in secret by those who know the true religion of the Roman Catholic Church. Part of the open
Replacement theology is the doctrinal belief
that the true Christian Church has taken
recipients of all the promises once made to the Nation of Israel.
Those who hold to Replacement Theology necessarily have to believe
nation has no longer a
place prophetically in God’s great scheme of things. In other words
church. As a practical matter we can see how much the government of the Roman Catholic Church might expand if it had
all the land God
The ultimate end of Replacement Theology is hatred and contempt for the Jewish people. To hold to this belief one
has to spiritualize or allegorize the Scriptures instead of taking it literally. But, this belief is insidious, having been held by a
number of deviant groups from the true faith once delivered to the saints.
The success of the late Pope John Paul II efforts to appeal
Jewish people by naming this park after him and by striking a postage stamp in his memory. This is an important event because it gives us a
view to how the false prophet and the Antichrist spoken of in prophecy might work together to deceive the Jewish people during the time of
Tribulation yet to come.
The park located at the Mount of Beatitudes in
John Paul II at the time of this writing gives the Catholic Church a modern, and friendly, imprint on the land. In 2000, during his historic visit
most of the history of this land’s relationship with the Catholic Church and will serve them a continuing psychological purpose. During the
Crusades, Jews often found their treatment from the Catholic Crusaders, influenced by the warrior monks to be more cruel than the treatment
received from the Moslems they had been living among for centuries.
Revelation 17, the Great Whore of verse 1, presumed to be the Roman
Catholic Church, is called the Mother of Harlots. What would qualify
Answer: A harlot
is a woman, who by definition, has prostituted herself for gain. Let us
look at how the Bible says this Great Whore has prostituted herself. Verse
two says she has committed fornication with the kings of the world and
made the inhabitants of the world drunk with the wine of her fornication.
Fornication is by definition any sort of impure sexual sin. Let us look at
be the Mother of Harlots the church would have had to produce offspring
that has similar character to hers. This is in fact the case. Though there
might be many good people, some who even love the Lord, in the offspring
religious bodies of Rome, that came out of the Reformation, many of these
failed in not making their separation complete. Even the Anglican Church,
which separated from
Lutheranism never made its break complete and its decline is a good
example of how one continues to slip down when one does not fully purge
out the old leaven. In
The greatest way spiritual harlotry can take place is in the
altering of the way of salvation. This has been done by making salvation the province of the church instead of God. It is the plain teaching of the Catholic Church that there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church. But the offer of salvation is made through submission to them instead of surrender to the Lord Jesus Christ and the receiving of His salvation as a free gift. Her harlot children have followed her lead in making their salvation primarily a works based membership systems full of ritual observances just like their parent.
Another way in which spiritual fornication is taking place in these
latter days is in giving credibility and acceptance to the religions of
this world. The Roman world started out incorporating the practices of
false religions into her system wherever she went and continues now in
these last days in trying to draw these worldly religions such as
Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam to her bosom. Some have included these
religions as being also the harlot daughters
So we see that Roman Catholicism is imminently qualified as the Mother of Harlots historically, and even more so as we see the end of the age approaching.
Question: I have heard that some churches are coming to an agreement with Roman Catholicism over the worship of Mary. The Anglican Church seems to be leading the way in this. How can this be?
Answer: For their to be a compromise of the Anglican Church with Rome over this issue after nearly 500 hundred years of “intense” division means that someone has to compromise their stand. Since the Church of Rome has been progressively becoming more and more open about their secret theology of Mary as Queen of Heaven, the Mother of God (not Jesus the Man), and Co-Mediatrix with Christ it follows that the ones doing the compromising are the leaders of the Anglican Church.
The devotion of Catholicism to their “Blessed and Eternal Virgin,” who is really not the mother of Jesus revealed in the Bible, is displayed in the thousands of statues and shrines around the world. This devotion is contrary to the teaching of Scripture and out of all proportion concerning what the Scripture says about the lady. Not only that it is contrary to the teaching of the Bible in both the Old and New Testaments, which teach against the making of “other gods” (including goddesses) as well the making of idols and idol worship. (See the Ten Commandments)
Just in the month of May, 2005, a new document titled “Mary: Grace and Hope in Christ” was published which included the statement “We do not consider the practice of asking Mary and the Saints to pray for us is communion dividing…we believe that there is no continuing theological reason for ecclesiastical division on these matters.” You might well ask yourself three questions concerning this statement from a commission that began working toward reunification in the 1960s:
1. If there is no continuing theological reason for division, what has happened to make there be no further reason for division?
The answer would be that someone had abandoned or compromised on their original belief.
2. Why would it be that a practice that was once communion dividing is no longer so?
Again it would be that there are those who do not love their doctrine nearly so well as those who have died for their faith in the past, so they are willing to surrender it.
3. If the problem is so easily resolved, why did it take the better part of half a century to resolve it once they began talks?
The answer is it took that long for the mystery of iniquity spoken of in the Scripture to get them to the point of compromise.
The Roman Catholic Church has progressively become even more open about its secret theology through the years. It was in 1854, a very short time ago in the Catholic scheme of things that they formally declared Mary as free from the stain of original sin from the moment of her conception. And, more recently in 1950, officially declared her assumption, body and soul, into heaven at the end of her life. Pope John Paul II would have gone even farther had he not been restrained by the Cardinals to get this compromise.
Question: There seems to be a lot of stories about Mary making appearances in various places around the world. Someone told me these appearances were increasing, and there were other miraculous events as well. Surely there must be something to this.
Answer: There is something to many of these appearances, which should more appropriately be called apparitions. But that does not mean that what is going on is from God, or that it is something God’s people should be involving themselves with.
One Catholic Internet site lists some 112 apparitions of Jesus and Mary since 1347 A.D. Newsweek said in 1997 that there had been more than four hundred apparitions of Mary in the 20th century, more than all the previous three centuries combined. The French periodical Le Monde actually estimated that the number of apparitions between 1976 and 1986 at 21,000. In fairness to the Roman Catholic listing, we must disclose they lump continuing apparitions in one location into one listing, even though they might happen again and again over a number of years. But having said that we must consider that Roman Catholic leadership does not want the critical thinker about these things to realize how many, and how wide spread these visitations are.
The phenomenon is not taking place in predominantly Catholic
countries anymore but in places like
Miracles seem to really occur along with these appearances. There have not only been healings, which are not only documented in Christianity, but are well known among occult practitioners; there have been other kinds of miraculous events as well. One of the most famous “miracles” of the 20th century was
the one that occurred at
the Fatima Shrine on
The new Pope, Benedict XVI, formerly known as Cardinal Ratzinger, while head of the Roman Catholic Church’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), declared that, "one of the signs of our times is that the announcements of ‘Marian Apparitions’ are multiplying all over the world." In that position he was the “enforcer” for Catholic doctrine. Since he has become Pope he has dedicated his papacy to Mary. The Mary of the apparitions, not the Mary who was the mother of Jesus, but the Mary who claims to be “Mother of God, Queen of Heaven.”
What we have been talking about is the greatest display of
paranormal activity in human history. There are a great many people who
would like for us all to take these events as a matter of faith but the
Word of God teaches us to try the spirits to see whether they be of God,
1John 4:1. Messages derived from apparitions at sites approved by the
Catholic Church have been consistently contrary to the Word of God but in
Cost per booklet $3.00
Postage free in
Overseas orders add extra for postage.
Special rates for bulk orders.
Churches may freely reproduce for teaching use.
ã Jonsquill Ministries (non Profit)
Free Subscription to E-mail Daily Thought upon request.
Write us for a current list of available titles.